For years, Razer has made some of the best gaming laptops on the market. They are not uniquely known for their high performance (blades are powerful machines but not the fastest) or (higher) prices. They are famous for their excellent build quality and design. In short, Razer makes the best gaming laptops on the market.
Razer decided this year not to limit the aesthetic to gaming laptops. In the first notebook computer designed for productivity rather than gaming, Razer combined its distinct look and feel with a 60Hz 16:10 touchscreen and a low-power processor with integrated graphics. Razer’s book aims to be Razer blade From the outside and a Dell XPS 13 Inside – and it mostly worked. Razer built an excellent laptop with performance that rivals the performance of the best Windows shells on the market. However, it is very expensive for what it offers, and it has some drawbacks that mean it will not be the right choice for everyone.
On the outside, the Razer Book 13 borrows many of the Blade Stealth 13’s signature features. A three-headed Razer snake adorns the cover. You can even recognize a customizable RGB keyboard for each key with speaker grilles on each side. (As opposed to what you’ll see in more Flashy gaming platforms, The lighting on these switches looks professional and adds to the sophisticated ambiance.) The chassis is in CNC machined aluminum, with a brushed metal finish. Here’s a fancy way of saying it’s so cute; The MacBook Pro Made from the same material, so are many of the best Windows laptops including the XPS 13 and HP’s Specter x360 14.
But some subtle differences make it clear that this laptop is intended for the office, not for gaming. It is slightly lighter than the Ghost BladeIt’s 0.6 inches thick and 3.09 pounds. The port selection is also better than the Stealth choice: there are two Thunderbolt 4 ports, one USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 port, one HDMI 2.0, microSD slot, and one combo audio jack. This is also a big plus the Razer Book has over the XPS 13 and MacBook Pro, both of which have relatively limited selections.
The biggest change, though, is the 16:10 touchscreen. This makes the screen taller than the 16: 9 panels you’ll find on Blade (and on nearly all gaming laptops). It gives you plenty of space for multitasking, with less scrolling and zooming necessary to see everything you need. Regardless of the aspect ratio, the 1920 x 1200 screen in our review unit was quite bright, with a maximum of 494 nits in our test. It is also vibrant with sharp and bright colors. While the palette has a glossy texture, it retracts little or no glow on bright settings.
Miscellaneous Laptop Things: The glass touchpad is very spacious and smooth – definitely one of my favorites. The speakers sound great, with strong percussion, although I have heard some noise at higher volumes. I almost never say this, but the webcam is not that bad; It delivers a fairly decent and accurate shot, despite the lack of a privacy shutter or an off switch.
In the void, I have very few complaints about the Razer Book’s chassis. I’ll point out that I find it a bit worse than the XPS 13 in some (subjective) areas. Not only is it heavier and heavier than Dell’s flagship, but it also looks and feels more stable, and lacks the elegant portability of the XPS. And while the Razer keyboard and touchpad are both good, they aren’t as exceptional as the XPS; Dell’s keyboard has more navigation and a more satisfying click, and its touchpad is slightly more comfortable. The most frustrating thing for me is that Razer offers less storage for the price. You only get 256GB of storage in the base and mid-range models, and you can only get 512GB in the higher $ 1,999 configuration – the 512GB XPS models come at a price as low as $ 1,399 USD, And the $ 1,599 XPS 512GB storage capacity while $ 1,599 from the Razer Book Only 256GB (otherwise identical specifications).
There is one area where the Razer Book strongly outperforms XPS, and that’s performance. All Razer Book models are Evo verified, which means Intel ranks them as the best performance. Our test sample includes a high-clock (28W) version of one of the best ultrabooks for the chipmaker, the Intel Core i7-1165G7.
This system flew during the challenging missions we threw at it. It took nine minutes and 21 seconds to complete our Premiere Pro media test, which includes exporting a 4K video of 5 minutes 33 seconds. This is the fastest time I have ever gotten from a quad-core 1165G7 system (which powers many of the best ultra-fast portable devices on the market). XPS 13 took 10 minutes 43 seconds to complete the same mission; More powerful XPS 13 2-in-1 It took 10 minutes and five seconds.
Despite this, Razer did not discover Apple’s M1 systems. The latest MacBook Pro finished the test in seven minutes 39 seconds. Of course, integrated graphics can’t hold a candle to a mid-range GPU, even in a thin and light body. The Blade Stealth 13 with GTX 1650 Ti eliminated export in just five minutes 50 seconds.
In real-life performance, the Razer Book also shines. The laptop handled the somewhat demanding load of Chrome tabs, Zoom calls, and other apps without any problem. It turns on from standby almost instantly and pretty quickly from its off state as well. Of course, the XPS 13 also does well in these scenarios.
While Book 13 is not a gaming laptop, it is a Razer-branded product, so some may wonder how to play it. The answer is that it offers some of the best integrated graphics performance I’ve seen from Windows shell. It is firmly ahead of the clamshell XPS 13 and is on par with a much more powerful 2-in-1 device. In practice, it is best suited for lighter and heavy games at low settings.
The Razer book averaged 142 fps Rocket LeagueMaximum setting without dipping to less than 125; XPS mode is 111 fps with a minimum of 100 frames. Razer also wins League of Legends, At an average of 219 fps to 205 fps Dell. Of course, with both devices having a 60Hz display, you won’t notice a difference in the quality of these games – but those numbers should give you a feel for the power of the Razer Book.
Graphic performance will make all the difference in heavy titles. The Razer Book beat XPS the most demanding hardware Note and observe At Ultra settings, at an average of 65 frames per second to 48 frames in XPS. It also averaged 32 fps Shadow Tomb Raider At its lowest setting, the XPS averaged 22 frames per second. This is important because it means you can play with action Tomb rider At 1080p on the Razer Book, which is unpleasant on the XPS.
This result also shows that – to repeat – despite the aesthetic similarity, this laptop isn’t a Blade. The Stealth 13 averaged 45 fps Tomb riderHighest settings. If you want to play around with this form factor then buy Blade. You will also get Way more storage For the price.
When it comes to cooling, the Razer book has slides. It did a much better job of keeping its CPU cool compared to the XPS in my test. While exporting to Adobe, the 1165G7 comfortably stayed in the mid-1960s to mid-1970s (Celsius) with occasional heights reaching the low 1990s. It remained largely in the 1950s through Tomb rider Benchmark, with heights reaching the mid-1970s. All in all, I didn’t see any throttling or slowdown, and the keyboard didn’t heat up uncomfortably under load.
But you’re trading up all that power: battery life. It’s not terrible, but nothing to write about. I averaged six hours and 45 minutes while using Book 13 for standard office work with occasional Zoom calls and broadcasts at 200 nits. (This was in the Battery Saver profile, which you can toggle in Razer’s Synapse program.) This means I can’t go an entire day without a charge, although the mileage will vary based on your tasks and settings. It’s got over nine hours of putting in a lot of machines the same workload, including the XPS 13.
Razer Book 13 has a lot going for it, especially for Razer fans. It’s definitely one of the best laptops you can buy – but whether it is The The best is a complex question to answer.
In some areas (keyboard, touchpad, portability), the Razer Book is slightly worse than the XPS 13. In others (display quality and build quality) it’s about equal. And it brings some cool features (port selection and RGB keyboard) that Dell’s shell isn’t available – but I doubt those make or break the buying decision for most people. On the grid, I think the Razer comes out a little worse on the front chassis.
But this is not where Razer’s book presents its case. This category is performance. Compared to other Windows oysters I tested in the past year, the Razer Book is the best in the class. It excels in productivity and media work as well as gaming. On the other hand, you are making some sacrifices for that power, in addition to the high price that it carries. You get a few hours longer battery life from a number of Razer Book-class laptops (including the XPS 13) and more storage space as well. For people in the book’s target audience (users looking for a mobile business or leisure driver), these trade-offs are probably worth considering.
Ultimately, the Razer Book 13 is an impressive new laptop from Razer that has a lot to like, and I’m sure many customers will be happy with it. But these trade-offs mean I can’t call it the best product for most people.
Любитель алкоголя. Возмутитель спокойствия. Интроверт. Студент. Любитель социальных сетей. Веб-ниндзя. Поклонник Бэкона. Читатель