They cited Spears and her father in their letter.
“Perhaps the most vivid example is the case of Britney Spears, a multi-platinum performer,” they wrote. “Since 2008, Mrs. Spears has been under court-ordered guardianship.” “The facts and circumstances that led to this arrangement are still in dispute but involve questionable motives and legal tactics by her father and now Representative Jimmy Spears.”
Jimmy Spears has carried out his duties diligently and professionally as one of Britney’s bodyguard, and his love for his daughter and dedication to protecting her is evident to the court. Anytime Britney wants to end her mandate, she can ask her attorney to petition for it; she has always had this right but has never exercised it since 13 General, “Turin wrote.
Jimmy Spears was first appointed by court to be an assistant in preserving his daughter’s property and person in 2008, after a series of personal cases of the singer that came to light in public. Britney Spears’ lawyer, Samuel D. Angham III, dismissed her father from the guardian position last August. During a hearing on the matter in November, Angham said Britney was “afraid” of her father. The judge ruled to retain Jimmy Spears as regent and appointed the Bessemer Trust to act as an assistant in preserving her $ 60 million property.
“[Jamie] I’d love nothing more than seeing Britney needing no tutelage, “Taurin told CNN at the time. Whether there’s an end to conservatism really depends on Britney. If she wants to end the guardianship, she can petition to end it. Jimmy isn’t suggesting he’s the perfect dad or he’ll receive a “Father of the Year” award. Like any parent, he doesn’t always see what Britney might want. But Jimmy thinks every decision he made was in her interest. “
Britney has not publicly commented on the ongoing battle of conservatism. The next session of the court at the guardianship is scheduled for March 17th.